Performance Management System of the Bhutanese Civil Service at a Crossroad

Authors

  • Indraman Chhetri Professor, Royal Institute of Management, Simtokha, Thimphu Author

Keywords:

performance management system, managing for excellence (MaX), forced ranking, employee dissatisfaction, Gross National Happiness, civil service reform, outcome-based performance, accountability

Abstract

This study evaluates the efficacy of the Bhutan Civil Service's current performance management system, Managing for Excellence (MaX), which has been debated amidst rising expectations for professionalism and public service delivery. Adopting a conceptual framework synthesized from Horwitz (2022) and enriched by insights from the OECD, World Bank, and McKinsey & Company, the study employed a mixed-methods approach. Data were collected through a survey of 539 civil servants across twenty districts, supplemented by interviews with 30 officials. The findings uncovered significant discontent, with an overall satisfaction mean score of just 2.80 out of 5. This dissatisfaction arises primarily from the mandated bell-curve distribution (forced ranking), perceived as a foreign, artificial, and inequitable tool in Bhutan's collective socio-cultural context. Critically, accountability registered the lowest mean score of 2.27, suggesting the system enforces bureaucratic compliance rather than fostering genuine ownership for results. Other critical weaknesses include the absence of multi-sourced feedback (client feedback rated lowest at 2.81), heavy emphasis on administrative aspects rather than developmental orientation (developmental planning mean score of 2.78), weak linkage between performance and career progression, low capacity of functionaries, and perceived deficiencies in transparency and fairness. Notably, consistently high standard deviations across all seven dimensions (ranging from 0.96 to 1.34) expose profoundly inconsistent implementation, where employee experiences are shaped more by individual supervisors than by uniform institutionalized processes.

Consequently, the core objectives of MaX: strategic alignment, performance differentiation, and enhanced accountability remain only partially realized. The study recommends a strategic paradigm shift toward an outcome-based performance system through operational flexibility, integration of multi-source feedback, stronger connection between performance and career progression, and creating a win-win performance culture, all while aligning with Bhutan's unique philosophical context towards transforming the civil service into an enlightened and entrepreneurial bureaucracy as envisaged by His Majesty the King of Bhutan.

Downloads

Published

01-02-2026